Women's Accountability: Societal Patterns and Discourses

The question of accountability is fundamental to a just and functioning society, where individuals are expected to take responsibility for their actions. In recent times, concerns have arisen regarding the perception of women's lack of accountability for their behavior. This article delves into this multifaceted issue by examining insights from various scholarly works and research papers on gender, femininity, and societal discourses. By exploring how societal patterns and discourses contribute to the perception of women's lack of accountability, we can gain a deeper understanding of this complex phenomenon within the broader context of contemporary gender dynamics.

Gender discourses play a pivotal role in shaping perceptions of women's accountability. Gill (2008b) brings attention to the impact of contemporary advertising, where "empowerment/sexism" portrays female sexual agency without acknowledging the ethical responsibilities that come with it. Budgeon (2011) delves into the influence of third-wave feminism and postfeminist ideologies, which may create contradictory notions of femininity, occasionally undermining the importance of accountability in women's actions.

Furthermore, Illouz (2007) examines the concept of "cold intimacies," wherein modern societal norms foster individualization, emphasizing personal desires over collective responsibility. This individualization may contribute to the perception of women prioritizing self-interests at the expense of accountability for their actions. Additionally, the rhetoric of choice and agency around female "cosmetic surgery" (Braun, 2009) may downplay potential consequences and accountability, reinforcing the notion that choices have no significant repercussions.

Neoliberalism's emphasis on personal responsibility and self-empowerment also shapes attitudes towards accountability (Oksala, 2013). The ideology of choice (Baker, 2008) and the concept of individualization (Beck & Beck-Gernsheim, 2002) further contribute to the perception that women are encouraged to prioritize personal fulfillment, sometimes overlooking collective responsibility.

Media plays a critical role in reinforcing or challenging societal attitudes towards women's accountability. The perpetuation of femininity ideals and the portrayal of the "ideal woman" (Gill & Scharff, 2011) in media can reinforce stereotypes and potentially absolve women from taking responsibility for their actions. These representations may lead some women to believe that they can escape accountability due to their gender.

Intimate relationships can also influence women's perception of accountability. Reynolds and Taylor (2005) discovered that single women often narrate stories that portray deficit identities, shaped by societal expectations, affecting their sense of agency and accountability within their relationships.

The issue of women's lack of accountability is deeply rooted in various societal patterns and discourses. Media representations, femininity ideals, neoliberal ideologies, and individualization all contribute to perpetuating perceptions that some women may evade accountability for their actions. By critically examining and challenging these discourses, we can strive towards a more equitable and just society. Understanding the complexities surrounding women's accountability will pave the way for fostering a culture that encourages responsibility and accountability for all individuals, regardless of their gender.

References:

Addie, E., & Brownlow, C. (2014). Deficit and asset identity constructions of single women without children living in Australia: An analysis of discourse. Feminism & Psychology, 24, 423–439.

Baker, J. (2008). The ideology of choice. Women’s Studies International Forum, 31, 53–64.

Baker, J. (2010). Great expectations and post-feminist accountability. Gender and Education, 22, 1–15.

Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. London, England: Sage.

Braun, V. (2009). ‘The women are doing it for themselves’: The rhetoric of choice and agency around female ‘cosmetic surgery’. Australian Feminist Studies, 24, 233–249.

Budgeon, S. (2003). Choosing a self: Young women and the individualization of identity. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishing.

Budgeon, S. (2008). Couple culture and the production of singleness. Sexualities, 11, 301–325.

Budgeon, S. (2011). Third wave feminism and the politics of gender in late modernity. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave.

Budgeon, S. (2013). The contradictions of successful femininity: Third wave feminism, postfeminism and ‘new’ femininities. In Gill R., Scharff C. (Eds.), New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity (2nd ed., pp 279–292). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave.

Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge, England: Polity.

Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19, 829–859.

DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 57–83.

DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2006). The unrecognised stereotyping and discrimination against singles. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 251–254.

Fenstermaker, S., West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2002). Gender inequality: New conceptual terrain. In Fenstermaker S., West C. (Eds.), Doing gender, doing difference (pp. 3–24). London, England: Routledge.

Gill, R. (2008a). Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist times. Subjectivity, 25, 432–445.

Gill, R. (2008b). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18, 35–60.

Gill, R. (2009). Mediated intimacy and postfeminism. Discourse & Communication, 3, 345–369.

Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (Eds.). (2011). New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies. Cambridge, England: Polity.

Oksala, J. (2013). Feminism and neoliberal governmentality. Foucault Studies, 16, 32–55.

Reynolds, J., & Taylor, S. (2005). Narrating singleness: Life stories and deficit identities. Narrative Inquiry, 15, 197–215.

Reynolds, J., & Wetherell, M. (2003). The discursive climate of singleness: The consequences for women’s negotiation of a single identity. Feminism and Psychology, 13, 489–510.

Reynolds, J., Wetherell, M., & Taylor, S. (2007). Choice and chance: negotiating agency in narratives of singleness. The Sociological Review, 55, 331–351.

Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.