Here is the POB question: Whose profit is it?
Imagine that you have a company, and one of your employees decided to take the money without telling you and invested that money in a business that he managed to earn millions.
By chance, another employee told you what happened...
The question that does not remain silent is: Who deserves the profit on this investment?
Situation No. 2 - Borrowed money
A young man borrowed 3 reais to buy a lottery ticket and this money made him win the entire lottery prize.
Should he split the premium or pay only what was
caught borrowed?
Unfortunately, the employee lost all the money and the young man didn't win the lottery...
If you think the profit should be shared, then you should be willing to share the loss, it seems kind of fair, doesn't it?
The fact is that ➴
0
0
0.000
Good one dear 😊👍. I guess if we share the profit, we should share the loss too. !PIZZA
@anacristinasilva! I sent you a slice of $PIZZA on behalf of @vikbuddy.
Learn more about $PIZZA Token at hive.pizza (1/10)
Yes, it's true... But the truth is, things change, at the time of gain, everyone would want to, but if lose, no one wants to share the losses.
The reality would be different depending on the situation. Thank you !
Quite a tricky question. I think nothing should be shared here has if the employee or borrower fail to land the jackpots he will end in a terrible situation. Profit shouldn't be shared and in the case of loss, the borrower or employee suffers it all. In reality that's the likely scenario as nothing was put to paper.
Yes, I agree with your comment.
The profits are for the employee who was wise enough to make profit from the money.
If he had lost it all, the owner of the money won’t take lost with him.
Well that's right...
😆😆😆 sorry but I need to laugh at this your question because thinking about it the other way round will make the person to be on debt over life time lol.
Well the person who deserves the profit on the investment is the employee who took the risk to invest the money with out informing the employer.
This is so because the employee is the risk bearer and he is totally accountable for that money as he/she did not inform the employer officially, so the employer do not have the jurisdiction to come ask for the profit that came from the investment.
The only thing the employee will do is to payback the capital used for the investment back to the employer with out hesitation unless the employee on his own decide to give a little commission to the employer.
The young man is only entitled to pay only the money he borrowed to play the lottery, he is not liable to share the premium with anybody as it wasn't part of the arrangements or terms of borrowing the money to him.
It a case where this happens and the employee lost the money of the company, what will happen is that the employee will end up paying for the money he invested with out the knowledge of the employer because he was not given approval to make any investment and neither was he communicated officially to embark on such investment.
The same situation also goes for the young man who looses the lottery and end up owning dept to the lender. He is liable to pay back every debt he lost in the lottery game.
Definitely you're right. If the profit was shared equally then the parties that shared it will also take part in sharing the losses.
Thank you.
Good answer... very sensible... but I believe that if that really happened it would cause a certain fight between both parties.
No i don't think it will the Rick bearer have all the profit, so all that needs to be done it payback your debt and move forward that's all.