First Contested Hearing in Crypto Class Action

avatar
(Edited)

@brianoflondon has given a great general summary of the first two days of contested hearing in the #Cryptoclassaction against Meta and Google.

FBA20013-66A7-4B26-9D74-C9653FD35BD7_1_105_c.jpeg

I wanted to set out the opening oratory speech with which I commenced my oral submissions to the Federal Court of Australia.

While good oratory is both expected and appreciated in the US Courts system and a part of the historic legacy of the British legal system, advocates before Australian Courts rarely engage in it and can often be plodding and dull. I think this needs changing.

The background to this introduction is that my name is Andrew Paul Stuart Hamilton (and that forms part of the name of the case) but the solicitor on the record for Meta had somehow written my name as "Paul Alexander Stuart Hamilton" on the front page of the main affidavit. This is an error that should not have got through the review process of a top law firm.

Oratory Introduction

"The First Respondent has some difficulty with my name.

While I am honoured to be confused with a founding father of the United States of America, Alexander Hamilton, I do have a historic namesake from that same era who shares both my actual name, Andrew Hamilton, and my profession.

This is what he had to say on 4 August 1735 in the case that established free speech in America - The John Peter Zenger Trial.

“Power may justly be compared to a great river. While kept within its due bounds it is both beautiful and useful. But when it overflows its banks, it is then too impetuous to be stemmed; it bears down all before it, and brings destruction and desolation wherever it comes. If, then, this is the nature of power, let us at least do our duty, and like wise men who value freedom use our utmost care to support liberty, the only bulwark against lawless power, which in all ages has sacrificed to its wild lust and boundless ambition the blood of the best men that ever lived….”

Source: https://www.famous-trials.com/zenger/87-home

In relation to the Respondents, who are the most powerful companies in the world, the law and competition law in particular, forms the banks which constrain their power.

This case is about enforcing Australia’s competition law and returning the Respondent’s river of power to the banks from which its has overflown, causing great destruction and loss of liberty.

It is into this context that we must consider the Respondents’ interlocutory applications.
Four points must be made at the outset before delving into the detail:

  • The fundamental perversity of suggesting that to protect the interests of group members they should be deprived of their only viable means of securing damages for the harms done to them by the Respondent’s ad bans.

  • The Orwellian “Precognition” like nature of the argument that because a person might breach some alleged obligation to group members they should be prevented from representing them at all.

  • How can the interests of justice ever be served by preventing the enforcement of important public law (Part IV of the CCA) in a case that affects millions of Australians and involves the most powerful companies in the world.

  • The Respondents’ complete failure to cite any authority demonstrating that the remedies sought (stay & declassing) are available to address the harms alleged (conflicts of interest and contingency fees."


The John Peter Zenger Trial is, of course, the basis for free speech in the United States and the source of the First Amendment to the US Constitution.
While the Crypto Class Action is not directly about freedom of speech, competition law and freedom of speech are two sides of the same coin.
The First Amendment protects against government curtailment of speech while competition law ensures there are free markets, including the market for ideas and competition for modes of mass communications.

I posted about this on Hive a number of years ago.


Please vote for my Hive witness. (KeyChain or HiveSigner)

Witness Vote using direct Hivesigner



0
0
0.000
17 comments
avatar

Right on!!!! Big news and I can't wait! It would be awesome for us to have such a win for our platform. And the community.

Blaze it!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well said. The importance of being able to write well, and speak well, to execute a successful lawsuit is clear. You appear skilled at both.
GodSpeed.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I know that many people think that you are doing a "Don Quijote job" here, but someone has to draw the line and you guys are doing tremendous work!
Bring those bastards down! 😃


I have picked this post on behalf of the @OurPick project which will be highlighted in the next post!

Comment Footer.jpg

0
0
0.000
avatar

On this is going to be amazing. You have my full support. 🤜🤛 Thanks for doing this for the crypto comunity.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for the update. I'm sure on some level they got your name wrong on purpose just to try and screw you over a bit more.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

No. There's no universe in which a top 5 global lawfirm partner wants to sign a sworn affidavit with a crushingly dumb mistake in it.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Fair enough. Maybe it was a subconscious thing.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The pen is indeed mightier than the sword, when wielded by a man that has studied it's use, and mastered it's application. You clearly have big enough feet to fill the shoes of your forebears, and for this I am grateful you stand between us and our oppressors, who would profit from our bones if they still carried wallets.

Thanks!

0
0
0.000
avatar

It’s very good news for crypto world.
Thank you for sharing.
With love for crypto;

0
0
0.000
avatar

Best of luck 🙌 I hope you get a big win🙏

This post has been manually curated by the VYB curation project

0
0
0.000
avatar

at first glance I thought that was McAffee on that pic xD
may he rest in peace

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm much better looking and younger than him, but I do see the resemblance.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @apshamilton! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You received more than 13000 HP as payout for your posts, comments and curation.
Your next payout target is 14000 HP.
The unit is Hive Power equivalent because post and comment rewards can be split into HP and HBD

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out our last posts:

Our Hive Power Delegations to the February PUM Winners
Feedback from the March Hive Power Up Day
The Hive Gamification Proposal
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!
0
0
0.000
avatar

Any new developments in the Crypto Class Action likely soon?

0
0
0.000