RE: Less Posts, More Curation?

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

I post as much out of habit as anything and I get far more engagement here than I would anywhere else. I don't have many connections on FB and my personal blogs never reached a wide audience.

People may as well post if they have something to share, but I will use my votes on the stuff I really like. I am finding enough of that for now to use them up and I rarely give 100%. I do vote up comments too as I want to encourage them.

This latest HF ought to be better for many people, but they have to be active to earn.

Maybe one day Hive will be filled with celebrities who get all the post rewards, but building up some HP allows us to earn from curation anyway.



0
0
0.000
14 comments
avatar

The Facebook lot just want to know, 'where is it'. Also they don't want to read a 900 word story. It's a different market but we have been there before.

More comments would be good. It's like before now, before the curve. There were many more comments and votes. Hope it gets back to that state.

0
0
0.000
avatar

But are 'the Facebook lot' one thing? Some of them might like long, detailed posts, but FB is not made for that format. I would hope some will make their way to Hive. I know there are different mindsets, but it's not a binary choice.

0
0
0.000
avatar

A percentage of them (like me) are other explorers and are looking for venues and clues as to where they are. Others are vandals, thieves, arsonists and spray painters. I get few engagers and barely any likes. The one below is a really good one concerning numbers (but a shit explore!).

image.png

On HIVE, I know the readers are NONE of the above things. If it's not instant gratification on FB, few bother.

Why do I bother? Because it exposes HIVE a little to the masses. Occasionally one makes it over and sticks.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I 100% agree that I get far more engagement on the Hive than anywhere else. Oftentimes I post on Torum or FB and get zero engagement because the post is too lengthy for FB readers or the Torum audience are only interested in pursuing Torum Missions for XTM rewards lol. Having celebs on the Hive is a concern for many I am sure as it has the potential to strip away a vast proportion of the available rewards in each 7 day cycle, simply due to their status and fan following. They should, however, not be precluded from joining and being a part of this wonderful community but perhaps there may need to be further proposals down the line to protect the community as a whole and to ensure its longevity in a form that continues to promote and support everyday bloggers, authors and curators. We don't want this platform to morph into something that becomes only a voice for a few celebs such that the ordinary person on the street stands no chance at seeing any financial success on the Hive beyond the social capital that they reap, as I am aware that a lot of authors on the Hive rely on Hive earnings to supplement their income or even as their main form of income, especially when coming from more disadvantaged circumstances. If we suddenly had ready made whales joining the community in their droves, I fear it may stifle creativity in general across the platform which is not helpful to anyone. I have seen suggestions previously around limiting individual post's maximum earning capacity and perhaps there should be some sort of algorithm that excludes short twitter style posts or posts that simply repost links to other sites and even reduces the number of posts one could upload per day to avoid abuse of the system. Perhaps specialised celeb style HIVE profiles should exist which are only able to attract a maximum reward limit proportion of the total pool between them? After all, their presence here should not be at the expense of the rest of the community and given their often vast wealth, their interest should really exist more for the social capital. I'd be interested to hear views from @steevc, @calumam, @leprechaun, @richardkrill , @proofofbrainio, @onealfa and @scholaris amongst others :-) No obligation to comment of course and please no need to upvote this comment either, as this is not the reason for tagging you, but I hadn't thought of this previously and understand that it could have seriously adverse implications for the diversity of the platform and the social capital that we all gain by being a part of this great community. Perhaps some further insights from longer standing members such as yourselves who have vested interests in the platform and do so much to retain a balance and support the authors and curators across the spectrum would help everyone to understand where this may all head :-)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well, if the celebrities comes, there's not much we can do aboutit. The platform is here for all and they're included. I guess we'd just have to adjust to the times should they come.

0
0
0.000
avatar

For now big celebrities are not too interested in Hive as there is not a big enough audience. I am not sure if we should feat getting some though as they still have to compete for rewards and each account can give out a few full votes each day. I think there is more potential in lesser/niche celebrities who could bring in a few thousand fans who may be willing to buy some HIVE. That could make an appreciable difference to activity here. It is all an experiment and we cannot be sure what will happen. If witnesses think that rewards should be limited then they could implement that.

!BEER

0
0
0.000
avatar

True! There are definite upsides to be had. I guess it's a case of maintaining a balance :-)

0
0
0.000
avatar

I just can't see Hive having a real future if it cannot attract people who will bring in a decent new audience. It's too cliquey for now.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Looks like you got a DV from someone who is doing the rounds seemingly randomly. If you check their profile they reblog another user name which is spreading the same narrative I have seen from a couple of accounts here. 🤨🙄😠

0
0
0.000
avatar

People are free to be trolls on Hive, but these downvotes do no damage, so I ignore them. Often it's someone who was caught out abusing the platform.

0
0
0.000
avatar

ok no prob, just thought I'd flag it to you in case you hadn't noticed ;-)

0
0
0.000
avatar

I had loads of those, but they are irrelevant. I don't even lose a cent. I have had the same from other disgruntled people for years.

0
0
0.000