RE: My View on Auto voting and Manual Voting
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
On this account, it's all manual. It gives me an opportunity to review the articles myself and provide any engagement I feel would add to the author's conversation. Manually curating is important to me, but it also takes a lot of time.
People using auto-votes responsibly tend to not have time to sit down and read through everything. That's understandable. You have to pick out the process that is best for you. If the POB community decided that auto-curations were the way to go, I would still follow my own path.
The important part of your conversation is relaying that the option, and importance, of manual voting, shouldn't be dismissed. Instead, it should be discussed and promoted like, for instance, in the manner you are following.
Definitely,that is one thing I also believe in and it is good to see that you are of the opinion of curating contents and comments manually,to me that is just one of the best way to actually gives credit to those who are putting their very best to make sure engagement keeps on going here.
Am not saying auto voting is totally bad too,but just that it is not an efficient way of giving rewards at times and I stand to be corrected on this opinion too.
I sincerely see manual curation as the way forward irrespective of how demanding it might be interms of reading contents and other things that are involved.