RE: LasseCash pool pays 49% APY
(Edited)
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
^^ dont feed the Ballhead Trolls
I had to respond here anyway, even I try to ignore the Ballhead Trolls: There was votes on my first proposal, but I deleted it since it was not enough to reach the funding, again you just make shit up. I am working on a new proposal, not sure when it will be ready, it will look very different, its called "learning by doing", "progression", "taking action", "if one approach does not work, do another one till it works".
Now leave me alone.
0
0
0.000
No there wasn't, even you didn't vote it.
There was votes when I deleted the proposal, you might not have seen it. Its true that it took some time before some votes showed up though.
Watch out for my new proposal, Ballhead.
Posted using LasseCash
O.K. For this I will definitely accuse you of being a liar.
What is it they say on the internet? Pics or it didn't happen. Provide screencap of that please.
I know you had one temporary vote early on. The user was voting to support every proposal and after I asked the user why they supported your asinine they took a second look and removed their support.
I was checking your proposal several times a day until you deleted it. I honestly wanted to know why someone other than you would support giving you 60,000 HBD to artificially pump the price of your own token.
I never saw one vote supporting your proposal that lasted more than a few hours before it was removed. I am virtually 100% sure your friend or whatever relationship @ironshield has with you didn't vote to support your proposal. Unless you voted before you deleted it you didn't even vote for your own proposal.
I was expecting you to create some fake accounts that would vote support but that didn't happen.
Nobody seemed to think, "Yeah, tricking people into FOMOing for LasseCash would be a great idea because if they sign up to lassecash.com they would need to create a Hive account. That would support Hive. DUUUUHHH! Me smart!" That only happened in your fantasy.
To be fair I know there was one temporary vote by @elevator09. I asked the user why they supported the proposal and after a second look @elevator09 removed their vote. The user was basically voting to support every proposal which would normally be a good thing to do in my opinion.
in another reply today @lasseehlers claims that he is going to make another "smaller" proposal. If so I hope @elevator09 will examine the new proposal before voting support again next time.