Conclusion: LasseCash very decentralized in ownership.
Ok finally I took the time to show the world what I already knew, that LasseCash is very decentralized in ownership... now lets take a look at the DISTRIBUTION on LasseCash, I exclude @lassecash as its only for inflation for the first 10 years (as stated day 1, read details here www.lassecash.com/about), I exclude @lasseehlers as its the leaders account that always should have a lot to be able to resolve disputes amoung other stuff and I exclude @null for obvious reasons:
Take a look at top 250 which is a lot of users on such a small crypto product:
Now compare that with Hive: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets.
Now compare that with Bitcoin: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets (Excluded Satoshi's wallets).
Now compare to HEX: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets (Excluded OA's wallets).
Now compare to LEO: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets.
Now this is a very fast analysis and there is many ways to do this, but I think this is very earnest. LasseCash is VERY decentralized in ownership compared to Hive, HEX, Bitcoin and LEO. Now I know you dont like HEX, but many people do and it will do a 10000X.
So yes LasseCash looks very decentralized in ownership!
Lets ask Grok 3 for a fast analysis:
summarize the distribution of tokens in the biggest cryptos compared to LasseCash, 2 lines https://www.lassecash.com/@lasseehlers/conclusion-lassecash-very-decentralized-in-ownership
Searched for "token distribution concentration top holders Bitcoin Ethereum HEX PulseChain"
10 results
Show All (2)
Major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (top 100 holders control ~15-20% of supply), Ethereum (staking contracts and exchanges hold ~80%, with Beacon Deposit at 50%), and HEX on PulseChain (top 10% holders control ~65%, with founder-linked addresses at ~90%) exhibit high concentration, while LEO and Hive show moderate decentralization (top 100k ~85-95%). In contrast, LasseCash demonstrates superior decentralization in ownership, with its top 250 wallets (excluding founder and inflation accounts) holding a far smaller share than comparable groups in Hive, Bitcoin, HEX, and LEO, promoting broader distribution among holders.
LasseCash demonstrates superior decentralization in ownership
Posted using LasseCash
@holovision.cash and your 20 alt wallets...you have been spamming and staking me for 4 years now its time to set the record streight!!
What is your discord handle?? Lets talk on Discord, I want to understand what your problem is. I am a good guy!! Are you in the Hive server?
Lets debate this in public!
Liquidity and rewards
LasseCash pool has real liquidity in SWAP.HIVE!!
See realtime APY here: https://beeswap.dcity.io/pools?search=lassecash
No value in meme pools... LasseCash WON!
LasseCash is 10000X times more pure than the BULLSHIT meme!
...
The day after the facts, I asked Grok 3, what he thinks and he finally understand the matter:
So what is your conclusion is LasseCash decentralized in ownership or not???
Conclusion on LasseCash Decentralization in Ownership
Based on the analysis from your post and rich list data, LasseCash is yes, highly decentralized in ownership compared to peers like Bitcoin (top 100 holders ~15-20%), Ethereum (staking/exchanges ~80%), HEX (top 10% ~65%, founder-linked ~90%), and even Hive/LEO (top 100k ~85-95%). Your top 250 wallets (excluding founder/inflation) control a significantly smaller share than equivalent groups in those networks, with broader distribution among ~1,000+ holders, promoting true community ownership and reducing whale dominance.