RE: Why take the extra risk of liquidity pools, if the alternative is already outstanding?

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

There are a few reasons people take these options:

  1. Instant liquidity - if you are staking SPS on Splinterlands, then you’ll get a 55% APR but you also have to lock your SPS for 28 days. Liquidity pools are… liquid! You can unstake instantly and take advantage of market movements
  2. Trading liquidity - by providing liquidity, you’re becoming a market maker and supporting the trading liquidity of that asset on another platform while getting paid fees + yield to do so
  3. Diversified yield - as seen with the recent rise in SPS staking, the yield can change drastically over night. In this case, it doubled the Splinterlands native staking yield but that may not always be the case. A liquidity pool simply offers another way to diversify the yield you can earn on an asset

This all being said, yes there is a different set of risk. There is also a higher learning curve. These are the trade-offs that make the APR for staking pSPS 2x higher than staking SPS on Splinterlands. Hope this helps!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

hive-167922 leofinance
0
0
0.000
17 comments
avatar

Hé man, I am definitely not trying to diss you here. It’s just not for me. And there’s nothing wrong with that. You are doing a great job, I have learned a lot through Leofinance, and you are to thank for that. Anyone invested in the LP’s, good for them and for the liquidity. I recognise that completely, but I just wanted to point out, that simple isn’t necessarily worse than more complicated… 😉

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

What could be more beautiful than a drop of water)... have you seen how beautiful it is?!)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

You forgot to add that it all feeds into the entire platform. The greater the success of the pSPS pool, the more it affects the other pools and all the other holdings on Polycub.

This is overlooked. People want to separate the different parts when they are all intertwined.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Liquidity pools are… liquid!

Yes, no fees for entering or exiting. LasseCash Pools pays 40000% now lol

Posted using LasseCash

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I think the yield on SPS in Splinterlands only doubled due to the VOUCHER price being included. Otherwise, the 20% or so from staking SPS is still there and you still get that 20% in the form of SPS.

You are correct about the liquidity but the trading liquidity isn't guaranteed. I don't really think there is that much demand for SPS because the utility on it hasn't been developed. This could change but for now, that is my view.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I think that a yield of 20% is already a great achievement.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

20% is laughable, who want to wait 1 year to get 20%??? Not me... HEX paid 10000X or 1000000% in 2 years!!! you need to come to your senses.

Posted using LasseCash

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

You're trying to mold candy out of shit, it doesn't happen, eat it yourself.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Dude I dont need you, who you think you are??? There are already people making those 40000%... that you like 60% over that, is your problem! I came up with the ideas for ONE OF THE BEST CRYPTO PRODUCTS EVER, so now stop commenting, if you have no interest in that, thanks!

Posted using LasseCash

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

You're right, I shouldn't waste my time on a crazy con man who has delusions of grandeur.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Oh you still believe we live on a ball, is that what you are saying???

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

If it's too good to be true, it probably is. I don't think that 10000x will last.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Let's just say, for the leisurely, SPS staking has everything a retired person needs)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply