Are the greedy owners of the splinterlands destroying the game which made them rich?

avatar

Are the greedy owners of the splinterlands destroying the game which made them rich?

Greetings friends!

Splinterlands was once a nice game and the game play was fair and transparent. Now it has become a tool for the developers of this game to get maximum profit while ignoring the fairness and transparency which is very necessary for any business. They are changing rules and settings of the game too much. They have their own players who always win, no matter how nice is the team of the other players. It seems that they are in the mood of reaping the maximum profit from the game and then dumping it. Otherwise, they would have played a fair game themselves.

What do you think about this game? Are the greedy owners of the splinterlands destroying the game which made them rich?

  • Yes.
  • No.
  • I don't play it.
  • This game is not fair.
  • This game is fair.

Answer the question at dpoll.io.

hive-120019 dpoll splinterlands game fairness leofinance bilpcoin lassecash hustler waivio meme proofofbrain battle
0
0
0.000
16 comments
avatar

Voted for

  • I don't play it.
0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

What specifics are you ranting about? So far the changes I have seen are more about expanding the game and thus bring more players in. I don't see any unfairness in any of that, of course I could be missing them so give me specifics. In that way I can give a more informed vote on your post.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I have seen in too many times that my monsters are always attacked by the enemy monsters no matter how able they are and I use dodge, phase and flying abilities. On the other hand my swift monsters miss attacks too many time and reverse in reverse speed ruleset. There are too many problems which is not easy to summarise.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I understand the battle situation especially with the soulbound cards being so overpowered. That will just take time to better understand how to fight against the new cards.

Back last century when we played MTG new booster packs would come out with cards that totally ruined most if not all currently popular decks. However with enough game play players were able to either find new combos better suited against those new cards or got enough new cards to fight on equal footing.

This is part and parcel of new cards coming out and expanding our game play. And yes it does seem to be unfair at times as those with more funds buy better cards or in the case of SL gain higher ranks such as diamond and gain more soul cards then others. One area where SL is better then MTG with new cards is that your battles are in a ranking region so better chance of having battles with more equal opponents.

For instance I don't have enough of these soul bound cards so I dropped into silver rank. I can get into gold rank but lose more battles then I like so once I get into gold each season, I do my best to stay in silver after that. Reaching gold once allows my EOS rewards to be at that level and playing in silver keeps me from being too frustrated with my losses.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Voted for

  • No.

It is equilibrated.
!PIZZA

0
0
0.000
Reply